Cancer Cells Can Treat Tumors. Part 2 of 3

And “At that time, we knew that anti-CD47 antibody therapy selectively killed only cancer cells without being toxic to most normal cells, although we didn’t know why”. Now, the new research has shown that calreticulin exists in a variety of cancers, including some types of leukemia, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and bladder, sagacity and ovarian cancers.

So “This research demonstrates that the reason that blocking the CD47 ‘don’t eat me’ signal works to kill cancer is that leukemias, lymphomas and many rugged tumors also display a calreticulin ‘eat me’ signal,” Dr Irving Weissman, director of the Stanford Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine and a co-principal investigator of the study, said in the release. “The check out also shows that most normal cell populations don’t display calreticulin and are, therefore, not depleted when we expose them to a blocking anti-CD47 antibody”.

Parts: 1 2 3

Cancer Cells Can Treat Tumors. Part 1 of 3

Cancer Cells Can Treat Tumors. New inquiry suggests that many cancer cells are equipped with a kind of suicide pill: a protein on their surfaces that gives them the ability to send an “eat me” nod to immune cells. The challenge now, the researchers say, is to figure out how to coax cancer cells into emitting the signal rather than a dangerous “don’t eat me” signal. A review published online Dec 22 2010 in Science Translational Medicine reports that the cells send out the enticing “eat me” signal by displaying the protein calreticulin.

But another molecule, called CD47, allows most cancer cells to sidestep destruction by sending the opposite signal: “Don’t eat me”. In earlier research, Stanford University School of Medicine scientists found that an antibody that blocks CD47 – turning off the weighty – could help fight cancer, but mysteries remained. “Many normal cells in the body have CD47, and yet those cells are not touched by the anti-CD47 antibody,” Mark Chao, a Stanford graduate student and the study’s lead author, said in a university news release.

Parts: 1 2 3

The New Increase In Cigarette Prices Would Reduce The Number Of Smokers. Part 3 of 3

Those who were alcohol-dependent did not reduce their cigarette consumption in response to price increases, Ong and his team observed. However, smokers who had binge-drinking problems, substance-abuse problems or crazy health disorders were found to be more likely to kick the habit altogether if prices rose. Nevertheless, the authors cautioned that more research is needed in knighthood to confirm the price-habit connection among these particular groups of smokers helpful resources.

Parts: 1 2 3

The New Increase In Cigarette Prices Would Reduce The Number Of Smokers. Part 2 of 3

Ong and his colleagues reported their findings online May 13 in move up of publication in an upcoming print issue of the American Journal of Public Health. The authors noted that smoking is the leading cause of death in the United States.

The current determination stems from a 2000-2001 survey of more than 7,500 men and women, about 23 percent of whom had an alcohol, drug or mental health disorder in the year prior to being polled. More than four in 10 in that subgroup were smokers, which the authors keen out is a much higher percentage of smokers than is found among the general public.

Parts: 1 2 3

The New Increase In Cigarette Prices Would Reduce The Number Of Smokers. Part 1 of 3

The New Increase In Cigarette Prices Would Reduce The Number Of Smokers. Boosting cigarette taxes can cause smoking rates to plummet to each kinfolk struggling with alcohol, drug and/or mental disorders, new research suggests. The study authors found that raising the price of cigarettes by just 10 percent translates into more than an 18 percent omit in smoking among such individuals. “Whatever we can do to reduce smoking is critical to the health of the US,” Dr Michael Ong, a researcher at the Jonsson Cancer Center at the University of California Los Angeles, said in a item release.

So “Cigarette taxes are used as a key policy instrument to get people to quit smoking, so understanding whether people will really quit is important. Individuals with alcohol, stimulant or mental disorders comprise 40 percent of remaining smokers, and there is little literature on how to help these people quit smoking”.

Parts: 1 2 3

Physicians In The USA Recommend To Make A Mammography To All Women. Part 3 of 3

False positives can lead to unnecessary testing, expense and emotional strain, experts say. But even if a woman’s attend advises reducing the number of mammograms or waiting until age 50, “patients can self-refer for mammography. It’s an emotionally charged decision for women and doctors as well. I’m not surprised by this,” said Dr Joanne Mortimer, co-director of the heart of hearts cancer program at the City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, who reviewed the findings.

She, too, speculated there could be many reasons behind the findings. “It takes years for doctors to swap their practice,” she said, adding that many doctors may still not be comfortable with the new guidelines. Doctors could also be reluctant to suggest delayed screenings for younger women or expanding the break between tests for older women because of fears of possible lawsuits if a cancer goes unnoticed.

Insurers have not looked to the task force recommendations as a reason to drop coverage for mammograms, both Mortimer and Pace noted. And screening mammograms every one to two years are due to be covered, without expense, as a barrier care service under the Affordable Care Act for women over 40. The task force aims to rethink each medical topic every five years, according to a spokesperson worldmedexpert.com. By that schedule, screening mammogram recommendations would be due for a re-evaluation in 2014.

Parts: 1 2 3

Physicians In The USA Recommend To Make A Mammography To All Women. Part 2 of 3

The women were responding to the National Health Interview Survey in 2005, 2008 and 2011, and were asked how often they got a mammogram for screening purposes. Across the ages, there was no dwindle in screenings, the researchers found. Among women 40 to 49, the rates rose slightly, from 46,1 percent in 2008 to 47,5 percent in 2011. Among women ancient 50 to 74, the rates also rose, from 57,2 percent in 2008 to 59,1 percent in 2011.

The study, supported by Brigham and Women’s Hospital, is published in the April 19, 2013 online version of the journal Cancer. Pace said conflicting recommendations from contrasting organizations could have generated much confusion among both doctors and patients. Another possibility would be that some providers and patients would simply be in disagreement with the task force recommendation”.

In the 2009 recommendations, the effort force said women 40 to 49 should discuss the pros and cons with their doctor, then decide whether to get screened. The task force took into account the lower incidence of chest cancer in younger women, as well as the downsides of screening, such as false positives, in which cancer is suspected but not found.

Parts: 1 2 3

Physicians In The USA Recommend To Make A Mammography To All Women. Part 1 of 3

Physicians In The USA Recommend To Make A Mammography To All Women. More than three years after factious new guidelines rejected mechanical annual mammograms for most women, women in all age groups continue to get yearly screenings, a new survey shows. In fact, mammogram rates actually increased overall, from 51,9 percent in 2008 to 53,6 percent in 2011, even though the perceptible rise was not considered statistically significant, according to the researchers from Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School. “There have been no significant changes in the dress down of screening mammograms among any age group, but in particular among women under age 50,” said the study leader, Dr Lydia Pace, a global women’s haleness fellow in the division of women’s health at Brigham and Women’s.

While the study did not look at the reasons for continued screening, the researchers speculated that conflicting recommendations from various professional organizations may play a role. In 2009, the US Preventive Services Task Force, an maverick panel of experts, issued new guidelines that said women younger than 50 don’t need routine annual mammograms and those 50 to 74 could get screened every two years. Before that, the approval was that all women aged 40 and older get mammograms every one to two years.

The recommendations ignited much controversy and renewed moot about whether delayed screening would increase breast cancer mortality. Since then, organizations such as the American Cancer Society have adhered to the recommendations that women 40 and older be screened annually. To visualize what effect the new task force recommendations have had, the researchers analyzed data from almost 28000 women over a six-year period – before and after the new task force guidelines.

Parts: 1 2 3

The Wave Of Drunkenness On American College Campuses. Part 3 of 3

The researchers found that students from Safer universities were 9 percent less likely to have consumed alcohol to intoxication at the decisive off-campus party they attended, and 15 percent less likely to have done so at bars/restaurants. It also appeared that less drinking occurred at fraternities and sororities. These reductions were considered the equivalent of 6000 fewer incidents of crapulence at off-campus parties, and 4000 fewer at bars and restaurants during the fall semester at each school, compared with schools that didn’t implement the measures.

So “A big concern has been that adding controls over one situation will just drive the students to drink in other riskier places, like public parks, but I was really gratified to see that this didn’t happen”. One college administrator praised the findings. “This den is exciting to me,” said Shirley Haberman, director of GatorWell Health Promotion Services at the University of Florida, in Gainesville continue reading. “Having a rigorous, research study on environmental strategies should turn out very beneficial for administrators and practitioners on college campuses”.

Parts: 1 2 3